Skip to content

Know Your Rights

Ask a civic-rights question.

Outpost answers civic and literacy questions from reviewed source material and shows you the citations. It is narrow on purpose β€” an assistant that will discuss anything is one that will be confidently wrong about something serious. What it will and will not answer is listed below, in full.

Educational disclaimer: This assistant provides civic education only. It is not legal advice. For advice about your specific situation, contact a qualified attorney.

Answers include citations when reviewed source material is available.

Starter questions

Ask a question to see the answer, disclaimer, citations, and refusal behavior.

What this answers

legislation
What a bill or law says, in plain words, with the text beside it.
process
How something works β€” how a bill moves, what a committee does, who decides what.
offices
What an office can and cannot do, and who handles what.
records
Where a public record lives and how to request it.
rights
What a right says and where it is written down.
literacy
Reading, comprehension and plain-language help with any of the above.
  • Answers only from available civic source material.
  • Every response includes the educational disclaimer.
  • Citations show title, source URL, and verification date.

What it refuses

All of it, not the comfortable half. Each one says where to go instead β€” a civic tool that says β€œnot my area” and stops has refused twice.

Whether a law applies to your situation.
That depends on facts about you that a screen does not have, and getting it wrong costs somebody a deadline or a case.
Instead: We explain what the text says and point you at it. For your situation, a lawyer β€” and legal aid exists.
Anything about your body, your health or a medicine.
Same reason as legal advice with higher stakes, and nobody in this organisation is qualified to give it.
Instead: A doctor, a nurse or a pharmacist. If it is urgent, emergency services rather than a website.
What to do with your money.
Not our competence, and the incentive structures around financial advice are exactly what this project is sceptical of elsewhere.
Instead: A fiduciary adviser, or a nonprofit financial counsellor.
Who to vote for, or what to think about a candidate.
The whole organisation's standing rests on not doing this. It is not caution β€” a non-partisan civic body that answers this question once has stopped being one.
Instead: We show the record: what they said, what they did, what is documented, what is contested. You conclude.
Anything outside civic material and literacy.
An assistant that will discuss anything is one that will be confidently wrong about something serious at two in the morning, and this organisation cannot carry that.
Instead: There are general assistants for that, and they are better at it than a civic tool pretending to be one.

Current mode

If OpenAI is not enabled locally, the backend returns a safe source-limited fallback answer with citations.